Municipal Complex Improvements

Earlier this year, Township Council approved a contract with Kimmel Bogrette to conduct a Space Needs Analysis of the Upper Providence Township Municipal Complex. This study was initiated to better understand current space limitations and to plan responsibly for the Township’s long-term operational needs.

Jump to Plan Comparison ↓

Why the Study Was Needed

The analysis was prompted by several ongoing challenges across Township departments, including:

Public Works

  • Inadequate indoor space to store supplies and equipment
  • Most equipment must be stored outdoors due to lack of facilities

Parking

  • Insufficient parking for visitors to the District Court building
  • Limited parking for the Township Administration and Police Departments

Police Department
The Police Department, which currently includes 16 sworn officers and one civilian employee, is significantly undersized for a community of our population and does not meet several Pennsylvania Law Enforcement Accreditation Commission standards. Existing limitations include:

  • Insufficient evidence storage
  • No dedicated space for evidence processing
  • No juvenile holding room
  • No sally port for secure prisoner transport
  • Inadequate prisoner processing area
  • No interview room for detainees
  • Insufficient armory space
  • Inadequate roll-call and meeting space
  • No conference room
  • No lunch or break room
  • No women’s restroom
  • No public interview room
  • No capacity for future staffing growth

What Happens Next

The Space Needs Analysis will resulted in six conceptual options for potential expansion or renovation of the Municipal Complex, from which Council may choose to move forward. If Council elects to proceed with an expansion or renovation, the full process — including design and construction — is expected to take approximately three years.

Municipal Complex Plan Options

View the Municipal Complex Master Plan Visual Options [PDF] that Kimmel Bogrette developed.

plan_image

Plan Comparison 

CategoryOption 1 πŸ”—Option 2 πŸ”—Option 3 πŸ”—Option 4 πŸ”—Option 5 πŸ”—Option 6 πŸ”—
Estimated Cost TierLowestLowestMiddleHighestHighestMiddle
Proposed Square Footage16,76013,60017,15820,87017,71017,260
Parking Spaces Proposed (now 38) 555856625858
District CourtRemains onsiteMoved offsiteRemains onsiteRemains onsiteRemains onsiteRemains onsite
Public Works LocationOffsiteOffsiteOffsiteOnsiteOffsiteOnsite
Salt ShedOffsiteOffsiteOffsiteOnsiteOnsiteOnsite
Meets Police Best PracticesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Secure Gated Police ParkingYesYesNoYesNoNo
Public Works Overflow StorageYes (remote)YesNoYesYesNo
Construction Relocation ImpactMinimalMinimalMinimalExtensiveExtensiveExtensive
Second Story RequiredYesNoNoYesYesYes
Elevator / ADA Cost ImpactYesNoNoYesYesYes

Plan Pros & Cons 

Option 1

ProsCons
  • Increased parking
  • Meets Police best-practice standards
  • District Court remains onsite
  • Minimal relocation during construction
  • Secure Police parking
  • Remote Public Works storage
  • Narrow two-way driveway to rear parking
  • Second story requires additional egress
  • Elevator and ADA cost impacts
  • Limited access and space for salt shed
  • Fire access through Ray Roche Park


Option 2

ProsCons
  • Increased parking
  • Meets Police best-practice standards
  • Minimal relocation during construction
  • Public Works overflow storage available
  • Secure Police parking
  • Remote Public Works storage
  • District Court relocated offsite
  • Less convenient for Police operations

Option 3

ProsCons
  • Increased parking
  • Meets Police best-practice standards
  • District Court remains onsite
  • Minimal relocation during construction
  • No Public Works overflow storage
  • Pedestrians cross main driveway
  • No gated Police parking

Option 4

ProsCons
  • Largest increase in parking
  • Meets Police best-practice standards
  • District Court remains onsite
  • Sufficient salt shed space
  • Secure Police-only parking
  • Public Works garage usable for storage
  • Second story requires additional egress
  • Elevator and ADA cost impacts
  • Extensive relocation during construction

Option 5

ProsCons
  • Increased parking
  • Meets Police best-practice standards
  • District Court remains onsite
  • Public Works overflow storage available
  • Sufficient salt shed space
  • Second story requires additional egress
  • Elevator and ADA cost impacts
  • Extensive relocation during construction
  • No gated Police parking

Option 6

ProsCons
  • Increased parking
  • Meets Police best-practice standards
  • District Court remains onsite
  • Sufficient salt shed space
  • Second story requires additional egress
  • Elevator and ADA cost impacts
  • Extensive relocation during construction
  • No Public Works overflow storage
  • No gated Police parking